Hall Of Fame Debate: PICK ONE: Ryne Sandberg OR Jeff Kent
For the first time, Jeff Kent will appear on the Hall of Fame ballot in 2014. And while we still have more than eight months to wait to see who ultimately is elected among the new/repeat players in that group, this week we will focus on the career of Jeff Kent.
And as I like to do, I will compare Kent to a player that I feel he matches up well against. This time around, that player is former Cubs’ second baseman and Hall of Famer, Ryne Sandberg.
Like Sandberg, Kent was tops among second baseman during his playing days, so this should be a fun comparison.
Let’s get right down to it. Here is a side-by-side:
| Kent | Sandberg | |
| Seasons | 17 | 16 |
| Games | 2,298 | 2,164 |
| On-Base % | 0.356 | 0.344 |
| Batting Average | 0.29 | 0.285 |
| Hits | 2,461 | 2,386 |
| 200-hit seasons | 0 | 1 |
| 150-hit seasons | 7 | 9 |
| Doubles | 560 | 403 |
| Triples | 47 | 76 |
| Home Runs | 377 | 282 |
| 40+ HR seasons | 0 | 1 |
| 30-39 HR seasons | 3 | 1 |
| RBI | 1,518 | 1,061 |
| 100-RBI seasons | 8 | 2 |
| 30 HR / 100 RBI seasons | 3 | 1 |
| Runs scored | 1,320 | 1,318 |
| Stolen bases | 94 | 344 |
| All-Star | 5 | 10 |
| Gold Glove | 0 | 9 |
| Silver Slugger | 4 | 7 |
| MVP | 1 | 1 |
| Postseasons | 7 | 2 |
| World Series appearances | 1 | 0 |
| World Series wins | 0 | 0 |
*
When looking at these numbers, there are quite a few similarities in their career totals. And there are some drastic differences too.
Sandberg was a more accomplished base stealer, defender, and appears to have been a more popular player based on his 10 All-Star Game selections.
Kent was the greater slugger and run producer of the duo – easily out-distancing himself from Sandberg in home runs and run production. Kent also appeared in the playoffs seven times compared to Sandberg’s two times.
So, that takes me to this week’s ‘Hall of Fame Debate’, and it is two-fold – (1)If you had to choose the better player based on his career accomplishments, who would you choose? (2) Is Jeff Kent worthy of Hall of Fame induction?
For me, when comparing the two, I can go back and forth quite a bit. While their on-base and hitting numbers are eerily similar, there are major parts of their offensive game that are not. Sandberg was much faster on the base paths than Kent, easily outpacing Kent’s career stolen bases by a ratio of more than 5:1. The same could be said for Kent’s power production – his doubles, home run, and run production is much stronger than what Sandberg offered. This could have a lot to do with where the player spent his prime years in the batting order on his team, but with the numbers so far apart, it is clear that Kent was more of a threat to drive the ball and knock in runs than Sandberg.
After careful, and exhaustive review, I believe that the better all-around player was Ryne Sandberg. His base stealing and defense separate him from Kent, and those two parts of the game are simply impossible to ignore. If I wanted one player at the plate with a man on second in a tied game, I would select Kent every time, but as far as what the player provided to his team, Sandberg was simply able to offer more due to his base running ability and defensive skills.
And now onto the conversation about Kent’s Hall of Fame future…
When I think about the greatest second baseman of the last 40 years, Jeff Kent’s name certainly creeps into the conversation. And to be honest – there are not that many standout players for that position. I believe that they all take a back seat to Joe Morgan, but after that you can say that Sandberg or Roberto Alomar or Jeff Kent is next. And at some point in the near future, the name of Robinson Cano may be part of that conversation too.
Ultimately, I think that Jeff Kent will gain Hall of Fame induction, and I am on board with that. He had a very solid 17-season career that included 7 playoff appearances. He took certain aspects of offense to another level that no other second baseman has, and that should be recognized.
While not someone who I would select on his ‘First Ballot’, I endorse Jeff Kent for Hall of Fame induction!!!
What do you think? Who is the more accomplished player – Jeff Kent OR Ryne Sandberg? And while you’re at it, tell me if you feel that Jeff Kent is worthy of Hall of Fame induction.
Thanks for reading. Have a great night!!



When I first saw this post I was going to automatically select Sandberg. However, their career accomplishments are quite similar. heck, I never even pulled Kent for mys star binders until very late in his career. I guess I would still choose Sandberg over Kent, but primarly because I remember stockpiling Ryno’s cards during his heyday where as I never did with Kent, and I will always have fond memories of him. Sandberg is definitely a HOF’er in my book and perhaps Kent should get in as well, eventually. After all the other deserving candidates make it. Maybe I should grab Kent’s 1992 Fleer update RC before he gets even more expensive, as that was a short printed set. Hmmm
Ron- I will admit that I really did not pay much attention to Kent until his numbers started to soar. The early years of his career may hurt him a bit when it comes to the vote…
First instinct for me was also Sandberg, my favorite player. I definitely thought HOF for Kent, but I didn’t think he would compare as favorably as he does Ryno until after having seen the stats. It’s actually a lot closer than I would have guessed it would be and in several of the stats Kent is clearly better.
I want to pick Sandberg, so I’ve gone out of my way to find stats that make Kent’s offensive advantage over Ryno look weaker, unfortunately, I can’t really find many (other than he grounded into more double-plays).
So I’ll just say Sandberg’s speed and fair superior defense makes him the better pick.
As for HOF, if Biggio doesn’t get in on first ballot, Kent doesn’t go in either the first time, but he will go in and deserves to go in.
WrigleyRegular- Nice wrap-up. I appreciate you taking out the ‘fan’ and being objective. Sandberg is not one of my favorites, but it is hard to ignore that he offered more varied skills than many!
My thoughts align with yours, nod to Sandberg but Kent is a HOFer after the first ballot. I am a huge Kent fan and he was a better run producer but Sandberg gets the nod for his all around play.
Adam- You and I seem to have a lot of similar opinions. You’re a pretty bright guy!! LOL
Hands down I think Sandberg is the better overall player and he definitely is a HOFer. I think Kent will get into the HOF eventually, but it’s a good thing he’s not depending on my vote to get in because I can’t stand him. If people aren’t voting for Albert Belle they shouldn’t be voting for Kent either.
Matt- Any specific reason for not liking him?
-Teammates who (actually) liked him thought he was a jackass.
-Insulting Vin Scully while playing for the Dodgers.
-”I’d like to leave the game without a single friend” is an actual quote
When you make me vocally root for Barry Bonds to kick your butt in dugout you are an awful person.
Matt- Wow, I had not heard of some of those issues. As we know, there are plenty of jerks in the HOF. Kent will more than likely be another one…
Named by BleacherReport as one of the 30 worst Clubhouse Cancers in Baseball. { http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1035006-30-worst-clubhouse-cancers-in-baseball-history } because of his ego. If you saw Kent on Survivor last season, I would say it’s true……….
WrigleyRegular- I’m not sure how theu built a calculation to measure that, but I would think that most if not all MLBers have some level of ego.
I kind of liked him on Survivor – he was a good competitor and the only reason I watched the show…